The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I partially agree with the statement that to solve pollution caused by generated waste is to impose strict limits on the amount that each house can dump. If we look at the bright side of the policy, it will possibly change the habit of how people buy things and throw away them. For example, when each house can only throw a certain amount of trash, instead of buying everything they like, people will start to think about what things do they need when they are shopping because of the new policy. This extra thought will avoid people from buying things they don’t need and will eventually turn into trash.
Moreover, the factories will also start to considerably reduce the number of papers or other materials they spend on the packaging. Since, when people start to take how much trash will the product cost, over-packaging will turn into a disadvantage, the selling number of these over-packaged goods will decrease soar. Besides reducing the waste, the government may also earn some money by feeing those who break the strict limits. The revenue can be used to improve the environment such as cleaning the polluted river or planting more trees on both sides of the roads.
However, the statement also involves some problems that need to be solved. Such as is it fair that the amount of trash each house can throw is the same? What if there are children and elders in the house and they need to use several diapers per day, is it fair to require them to throw an equal amount of trash as a family with only two grown-ups? Instead of imposing same limit on each house, the government should come up with different levels of limits of trash they will require, taking how much adults, children, and elders are there in a house into consideration.
Besides, people may also break the law by throwing trash secretly by themselves, and this may cause even a much more serious environmental problem. For example, people may dump their plastic waste into lakes or oceans, Once the fish in lakes or oceans see the waste, they might think the plastic waste is something they can be fed on. However, after eating the plastic, they can digest or dissolve them, it turns out that lots of fish will die because of the plastic waste.
The best way to solve environmental problems is not limiting how much trash a house can dump but to educate people that it is really important to protect our Earth. Since if every person Earth knows that it is wrong to waste things and gratitude to what they’ve got, there will no longer be waste or things that may harm our mother Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current trends will double over the next 50 years thus making existing dormitory space inadequate Moreov 69
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... of trash they will require, taking how much adults, children, and elders are there ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66593406593 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31002080328 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498901098901 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2802480736 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.882352941 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7647058824 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22495024022 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803904885461 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611844813669 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130565428477 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04809222477 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.