The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The two graphs illustrate the percentage of reasons to study and employers support according to different age groups from under 26 to over 49.
Overall, it is noticeable that the younger age employees were, the higher quantity of reason for career but less in that referring to for interest they had. Furthermore, workers in the age of under 26 received the highest amount of support from the higher place, while employees didn't support people aged 30-39 as much as they did to other ages.
As can be seen obviously, the main reason for the first youngest group to study was for their jobs, remained at 80% of their target, which was the highest amount of reasons to study among other groups, whereas they didn't have much interest for studying like older people, especially the one over 49 years old, at about 10% compared to 70% respectively. On the other hands, students at the age of 40-49 had the same quantity for both their jobs and interest, at 40% each.
Moreover, the amount of employers support to each age groups was uncertain. These students were cared less due to the higher age they had, which showed the decrease in the quantity of time off and help with fees from over 60% for the youngest age group to the bottom at about 35% for 10-year older one. However, after when officers reached the aged of 40, people in higher position looked after them more carefully but not as much as the age groups from young to 29, at from 40 to 45%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | kashyap sahil | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | 73 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- the chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 85
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 56
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... from the higher place, while employees didnt support people aged 30-39 as much as th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... study among other groups, whereas they didnt have much interest for studying like ol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58461538462 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26003351287 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0876910915 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42629977129 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195722816124 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669828674317 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267101538103 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286713031214 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... from the higher place, while employees didnt support people aged 30-39 as much as th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... study among other groups, whereas they didnt have much interest for studying like ol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58461538462 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26003351287 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0876910915 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.375 5.23603664747 236% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42629977129 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195722816124 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669828674317 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267101538103 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286713031214 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.