The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the number of visitors in four different locations surveyed in Brighton and how these rates changed over a 30-year period, starting from 1980.
Overall, there were fluctuations in the proportion of tourists to England in all four different attractions in Brighton during these years. While Pavilion and Pier engaged more visitors after 30 years, the opposite was true for Art Gallery. Also, the number of tourists attracted by Festival had no change much.
Looking at the graph for more details, it can be seen that the percentage of tourists to Pier fluctuated between 9% and 15% over the early 25 years before going up gradually to 22% in 2010. Whereas, that of Pavilion increased slowly about 5% in 1985, kept growing up rapidly to reach a peak of almost 50% in 1995 and then witnessed a significant decrease to 30% in the remaining time.
Besides, starting at over 30% in 1980, the proportion of tourists who visited Festival was one and a half times that of Art Gallery. It witnessed a strong increase to 38% in 1985 before returning back to 20% in 1990, remaining this number during the next 10 years and finally plunging to less than 10% in 2010. By contrast, that of Festival fluctuated around 30% over the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...a strong increase to 38% in 1985 before returning back to 20% in 1990, remaining this number d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, if, look, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78703703704 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5426910504 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587962962963 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3345323586 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141033065167 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623190660728 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673963989566 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919569072487 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466395855778 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.