Some people believe that government spending on the care of the elderly should be priority. Others think government spending should be more focused on the education of the young people. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today’s society, many people believe that the local authorities should prioritize expenditure on care of seniors, others think that provide funding for education of the young generation is much more crucial. While those two are both necessary, I prefer educating young people, especially the teenagers rather than the former idea.
On the one hand, the elderly are entitled to receive support from the government. First, because the elderly contribute to national budget under the term of tax payment when they was in working age, the officials have the responsibility to ensure their living standard since their age and health are not allow them to work. In fact, by providing more policies for the old people, local residents would be more willing to pay tax as this payment would bring them more benefits in the far future. Hence, the rate of tax evasion could be significantly reduced and that would lead to government’s budget being widen remarkably.
On the other hand, there are some reason why the local authorities should concentrate on educating young generation. First of all, young people, especially teenagers and children are supposed to be the next generation workforce of a country. If the governments prioritize expenditure on education for them, precisely, constructing more schools and universities in local areas or carrying out more research about methods of improving teaching quality, young people would be able to level up their knowledge, which results in a productive labor force later leading to the prosperity of the society and nation as a whole in the future. Moreover, by investing more on education, the number of people neither read nor write would fell result in the reduction of illiteracy rate. Hence, dwellers could easier to find a job in order to ensure their living standard without government assistance.
In conclusion, though both of view are logical, it seem to me that it is better to prioritize expenditure on educating young generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-08 | longle251198 | 72 | view |
- Some people believe that government spending on the care of the elderly should be priority Others think government spending should be more focused on the education of the young people Discuss both views and give your own opinion 72
- Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities privately owned vehicles should be banned in city centres while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 73
- The bar chart below gives information about water use in China USA Russia and Australia in 2010 67
- The chart below show the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in 5 Australian cities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allowed'.
Suggestion: allowed
...dard since their age and health are not allow them to work. In fact, by providing mor...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...on, though both of view are logical, it seem to me that it is better to prioritize e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21806853583 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82733922786 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.05865905 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.583333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282035869718 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969669254247 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606402288001 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164623159411 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574760777045 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.