When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is undeniable fact that technology has used in every walk of life, nowadays. Due to advancements in technology, conventional skills and old lifestyle are disappeared. It is argued that to save these skills and lifestyle are worthless, while I completely disagree with this idea and the reasons which are glanced through tailed paragraphs.
To embark on it, keeping old lifestyle and skills alive have several benefits to us. First and foremost, traditional ways of living life help us in tackling all life problems. In other words, it proffers us certain principles of being happy and satisfied with our life. These principles are played a key role in our modern life. As a result, if we want to live our life happily, then we would have to follow them and act accordingly. Secondly, the traditional lifestyles of our ancestors provide us a method to live life compatibly with nature. They had used environmental friendly ways to develop their cities and localities. For instance, in southern part of India, most of the people preferred to eat in banana's leaves which are pollution free and cheaper. So, these styles will definitely pass on the their upcoming generations. Hence, saving these ways of living will be worthwhile.
Another point consider is that conventional skills of a country will help us in gaining popularity. For example, in the Gujarat state of India, only one family knows how to make 'patoda' which is one type of saree, but they make it by their hands. It is eminent not only in India but also in other countries. Due to having these traditional skills of making products, they will earn more respect for our nation and culture than ever before. Consequently, it will be grateful to encourage people to follow their traditional skills.
In conclusion, although our traditional skills and lifestyle are wipe out because of developments in technology, maintaining these skills and lifestyles would be our responsibility. Thus, I believe that we should put adequate effort to keep them alive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | InamAli | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | maryyrle | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Amnusheenh | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 48
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend It should be limited To what extent do you agree 61
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f we want to live our life happily, then we would have to follow them and act acc...
^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...o, these styles will definitely pass on the their upcoming generations. Hence, saving the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05988023952 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87348417901 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8916537298 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198656214989 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583100551198 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412858023449 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120537093399 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393513184777 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.