Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Educating kids to become decent society members has gained increasing popularity for years. Despite the belief that this mostly relies on parents’ capacity, other people support the school's role in training them. This essay will discuss both views and offer my opinion.
Several reasons can be observed for why teaching social responsibilities at school is crucial. The first is the qualifications and a well-rounded system schools have. Thanks to numerous materials and professional staff, teachers may provide children with trustable lessons about widely accepted rules and manners. Furthermore, many parents nowadays have a lack of time and appropriate methods. This can be especially true in Western countries where career achievements and financial goals are usually prioritized even for married couples. In brief, schools might be more equipped in shaping society members.
On the other hand, supporters have their arguments. It has been found in research that the 1-to-3-year-old period is fundamental to every kid’s future. This can include physical and mental health, personality, and language development. As a result, if these aspects are nurtured well by parents, it would be of a big advantage to the kid’s success in later years. Another point is that training children with social skills can be a lot easier when parents understand their kids’ strengths and weaknesses when interacting with people. Due to the biological bond they share and the amount of time spent at home when children are often in their most comfortable environment, parents can step in just in time to correct any misbehaviors and encourage positive social traits. In summary, parents have great access to their children’s key development phase and profound understandings of their kids’ uniqueness in communication and behavior.
In conclusion, each party can bring distinguishing advantages in the teaching process. From my perspective, without either, it would be extremely challenging for any child to learn subtle yet essential things like social cues and unspoken rules so that they can learn to respect others and be respected. This does not only fall in the hand of parents and schools but also the government and every single adult in society to ensure the bright future of a country or the world at large.
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 95
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...nts’ capacity, other people support the schools role in training them. This essay will ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in brief, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41712707182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93537762576 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632596685083 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3453797499 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.210526316 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229280986032 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658756217601 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466493408083 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149636350454 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567230646722 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...nts’ capacity, other people support the schools role in training them. This essay will ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, well, in brief, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41712707182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93537762576 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632596685083 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3453797499 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.210526316 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229280986032 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658756217601 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466493408083 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149636350454 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567230646722 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.