The graph below shows the amount of money spent per week on fast food Britain. The chart shows the trends in consumption of fast food.
The bar chart describes how much pence England citizens are using weakly in fast food. Furthermore, the line graph explained the eating habits focused on fast food meals by years.
Overall, it is explicit to observe that fast food consumption is present in all income groups but weakly the High-income group spent expressive more money than others, especially in hamburgers. This group spends 40 pence per week in hamburgers, more than two times compared with the lown-income group, they invest less than 20 bucks per week with hamburgers. But fish and tips is a second option for all groups researched, high-income and low-income wasted less than 20 pence per week and the average-income spent a bit more values near 25 bucks weakly.
The line chart reflects the behavior across twenty years. Fish and chips were the preferred fast food in 70 decades with 300 grams per week but after this start to oscillate and in 1993 showed the same value of hamburgers, 200g per week. On the other hand, hamburgers are in constant growth during this period. In the beginning, this consumption represented less than 100g, and they finished this period with five times more than this, near 500g weakly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-30 | leandro_bsb | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 73
- the graph below shows the spending of uk residents on visits abroad between 1993 and 2013 79
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries How far do you agree with this statement Use your own examples to support 60
- The graph below shows the reasons for the use of social media by business by size of business in 2012 40
- The bar chart below shows US seafood imports for 1986 1996 and2016 and the forecast for 2026 The pie chart shows thegeographical structure of these imports in 2016 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The bar chart describes how much pence England citizens are using weakly...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, second, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52713276264 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4565620478 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25705154092 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110837837129 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863963634178 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186406454917 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497786231685 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.