Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties, birthday
parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money. Others, however,
think that these are necessary for individuals and the society.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is currently a contentious argument over whether people should spend a lot of money for celebrating events such as birthdays and wedding parties. While some people believe that it is simply a waste of time and finances but others argue that these are important for individuals and society. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion on the matter.
Beyond any qualms there are myriad of logical reasons to explain why celebrating family functions is an important aspect in the society. Every person is a social being and when they themselves attend the family functions of others then it becomes an obligation to invite others in their functions as well. Moreover, it is a chance for the whole family to get together with distant relatives who otherwise do not meet so often.
Furthermore, festivities are more fun and entertaining when all the members, neighbors and relatives are together. For instance, Indian weddings are famous for their pomp and show as it continues for three days and all the distant relatives and neighbors get together to not only celebrate the event but they even help in organizing the event with the host which in turns strengthens the relationship and bonding of the whole family.
On the contrary, others believe that celebrating marriages and birthdays are simply a waste of time and money. Celebrations have become a status symbol for showing off wealth and resources. Sometimes people get overboard and spend lots of money for the wedding leaving them without any savings for future. The money could instead be utilized for the bride and groom to start their life together by making payment for their apartment or any other possession together.
In conclusion, I believe that it is important to celebrate family functions in the society as it is a matter of emotional connection with the members of the family. However, the financial planning should be done wisely so as not to go overboard under peer pressure. Whether the middle class people realize this difference? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-29 | Rachana92 | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | maithanhtu02@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | vinhchau2020 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | vinhchau2020 | 73 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- There are many female students who finish degrees in science and technology courses at university but few move into the workplace after they graduate Why is this What measures can be taken to encourage them into work 75
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99715099715 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66907931378 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5916174796 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25793422291 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812271712753 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730982994326 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141394866697 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106537078992 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99715099715 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66907931378 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5916174796 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25793422291 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812271712753 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730982994326 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141394866697 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106537078992 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.