TPO49: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Friendship is one of the most crucial needs of humans. Everyone needs friends and social communication. Beyond having social relationships, people need their friends to share happiness and sadness, to get help in rough days. People have different strategies in friendships. Some prefer to have a small number, But long-lasting friends. Others are passionate to make many new friends. In my opinion, I agree with the mentioned statement in question.
To begin with, friends are family members that we choose. We are not forced to accept them. We find them by ourselves. As I said, we need them by our side in our lives, not just for a short period. I live far from my family, and now, I spend more time with my best close friends. They are my family now. They always love and support me. So it could not happen if I had not the ability to find friends for a long period. And as a result, it brings me joy and happiness instead of loneliness far from my hometown.
Moreover, I think long-lasting friends are more reliable. So it is important to keep these friendships. When you have someone to confide, to tell your secrets, you will be more healthy mentally, because you do not have to keep everything in your mind. And most people are more convenient to speak with a reliable friend, not family. Or when you need someone, who is better than an old friend? One day, one of my best friends had a car accident. She did not want to make her parents worried, so she immediately called me and another friend of ours. We stayed with her every day and night in the hospital.
To sum up, making a lot of new friends is somehow exciting, and it may make you happy for a while. But friendships forever? It gives you deep happiness for a lifetime, that you feel it inside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Essay topics The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are arou 76
- TPO 2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 76
- TPO48 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, while, i think, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5375 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59084174304 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559375 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0521030454 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 53.7777777778 100.406767564 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8518518519 20.6045352989 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341767475805 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077205474264 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569665419539 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191353820729 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269742655096 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.9 11.7677419355 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.23 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.1575268817 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.16 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 3.5 10.002688172 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.