The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The provided pie charts demonstrate the data of the amount of water used for five distinct department assemblages in Sydney, between 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the food sector accounted for the highest portion of the total water. Furthermore, the load of water consumed for food, building, and manufacturing industries decreased over the period.
As can be seen from the charts, nearly half of the water supply was operated in the food sector in 1997, thus tumbled on 7 percent after a decade. Having the same downgrading pattern, the chunk of water used for manufacturing major fell to 11% in 2007 after standing at 15 percent in 1997. Constituting a tiny fraction, the figure for the building sector significantly plummeted a half after 10 years.
In contrast, there was an upward trend in the data of Sydney water usage during a decade. In more specific details, The record of water amount spent on service sectors in 2007 excessively doubled the figure jogged down in 1997, rose from 13% to 25%. Also, the water supply aiming for household use increased from 19% to 21% after ten years.
To sum up, there is a tendency that Sydney citizens would rather consume more water for the household aspect and service industry than other fields.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 73
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 89
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 84
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in 1997. Constituting a tiny fraction, the figure for the building sector signi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88785046729 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57886354133 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6595011643 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185314666298 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803377778596 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432188479089 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111591234112 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482671427125 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.