Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems of human beings. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
While there are grounds to argue that endangered species should be prioritized to preserve, it can be equally disputed that the world should put more attempts to deal with the present issues of global residents. In this essay, I shall examine the merits of both sides of this question and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, there are many people who claim that wild animals should be extremely protected because some are on the brink of extinction. A convincing justification for this belief is that each kind of animal is a key factor in establishing the balance of wildlife habitats. It is also portrayed via a certain example that if the rhino, which is a type of herbivore eating the fruit explicitly fallen on the ground, disappeared, the floristic composition would have a variety of detrimental changes brought about by the densely overwhelming fruit carpet covering the land.
In contrast, it is feasible to make the opposing case. It is often indicated that in fact, human beings’ issues are widely cited as a top concern needed to address first. People often have this opinion because they are intensively familiar with their daily. To be more specific, social problems relating to education, politics, social tensions and so on directly affect how people efficiently live on this globe. However, being easily forgotten, environmental issues including the continuous loss of some animal species should be preferred to solve before tackling all the communal problems because the Earth is our shelter where we are staying.
Having looked at both sides, there are no splendid answers to this question. On balance, I tend to believe that the endangered species should be saved immediately with serious endeavors by the virtue of the natural balance of biodiversity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10273972603 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75110650047 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6781599435 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251075131751 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079295902361 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073976827618 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140378379433 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352864715013 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.