Some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete. Others think that work performed by humans will always be important.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Technological progress has revolutionized the way people deal with their work. Therefore, some people would argue/believe that due to AI development, human workers will be no longer needed. Nevertheless, in my viewpoint, people will always play a vital role in many occupations.
On the one hand, the human workforce should be replaced by artificial intelligence as these automated programs are developed as labor-saving devices, thus boost productivity and increase the revenue. To illustrate, numerous manufacturers nowadays apply computer-integrated manufacturing into their production process, which not only can be faster and less error-prone, but it also gives rise to cost-reduction in worker employment. This example indicates that advances in automation technology help handle many tasks previously occupied by manual laborers with absolute proficiency and lessen payments for the manufacturing workforce, which is one of the criterias prompting these manufacturers to go for AI-driven machines and robotics in lieu of traditional working practices by workers.
Although AI is advancing at an incredible pace and doing things that were once thought to be within the sole territory of humans, I am more inclined to believe that there are still obviously some areas where algorithms need humans. No matter how efficient the AI technology itself is, it can sometimes be faulty and therefore needs the precision coming from human intelligence. For instance, regarding medicine, although AI technology/automation proves applicable to various operations and treatments, some tasks done by doctors and paramedics still hold a crucial role when it comes to accuracy and precision. Moreover, even though ingenious inventions such as iPhone nowadays have the machine learning capacity/ability, they do not yet possess some unique human capabilities in terms of soft skills such as teamwork, communication, creativity, and critical thinking to count a few.
To conclude, although the advent of artificial intelligent marks an important milestone in human development, it can not wholly replace many aspects of the cognitive performance of humans, most notably includes precision and soft skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-20 | Diabolo | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | Ngô Nguyễn Thanh Nhã | 96 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 73
- Some people believe that the development of artificial intelligence will make human labour obsolete Others think that work performed by humans will always be important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 96
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80555555556 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43309088378 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675925925926 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.27709974 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4545454545 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231770033127 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861879651605 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05945645713 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139486341894 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591694049577 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.01 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.