Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
A controversial topic may create serious concern over the society and people with certain beliefs might not be tolerable towards the questioner. It might get messy if the situation is not handled with caution. The facts might create a society diveded between various concerns rather than a peaceful harmony. But sometimes a truth has to prevail beyond one's personal interest. Otherwise in future things might not get good and clash might get inevitable. The controversial topics should be on the priority list of debate due to four particular reasons.
Firstly, the debate over controversial topics will certainly alert intellectual people onf the society. This is very important as controversial topics may create serious situation and the whole society will get affected. If the topics are debated, the pros and cons has to come out. These points will not be crafted as weapons in future to disturb the harmony. People in a society might live with many beliefs, but cannot live with anger towards other and hence a proper discussion may point out the overall problems that could create problems in near future.
Secondly, for any society, freedom of speech is one of the important parameters that makes it liveable and greater than other ones. Freedom of speech crosses path with controversial topics several times. But the thing is that freedom of speech gives us to think way beyond the box. Discussion on controversial topics will give freedom of speech a certain position in society and the persons with decisive mindset might give him/her a second thought before a crime that it is freedom of speech that has overcomed the controversial topics and it well win against also himself/herself.
Thirdly, people get aware of the whole situation of a society when debated over controversial topics. It will help to identify who is who. An enemy infornt of a person will provide greater relief that a friend side by side. People with double characters also have to declare their beliefs that might harm anyone sooner rather than later.
Fourthly and most important thing is that these discussions will help to enlighten greater sect of people. A knowledged society is perhaps a peaceful society. And with a peaceful society a true leader can climb the hardest hurdels in future.
Many may argue that controversial topics may lead to social disturbance, hate crime, assasinations of scholars etc but they all are beacuse of those people who are sitting around and waiting for the perfect time to create anarchy. Moreover, these debates/discussions will cut off their ways to anarchism. Hence, I strongly agree with the discussion on controversial topics as it will be for a better future of all.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 58
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 60
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 70
- People are given more time for personal enjoyment in the present than in the past Give a view on that 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... prevail beyond ones personal interest. Otherwise in future things might not get good and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wins'?
Suggestion: wins
...ed the controversial topics and it well win against also himself/herself. Thirdly,...
^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ue leader can climb the hardest hurdels in future. Many may argue that controversial top...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...n climb the hardest hurdels in future. Many may argue that controversial topics may lea...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08108108108 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76662764984 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.6270769691 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.24 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.76 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209399985295 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615133952084 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571733622819 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116488067774 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404160569352 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.