The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The bar chart provides information about males and females physical activity in different age groups in Australia in 2010, measured in percentage.
At the first glance, the percentage of physical activity of men reached a minimum in age group 35 to 44, whereas females experienced a maximum in 45 to 44. In other words, reduction in activity of men was coincided with the women activity increasing.
Obviously, in age group 15-24, men did more exercise than women, 52.8 compared to 47.7. After that, physical activity of men decreases until age group 35-44, and eventually showed a growing in age 45 and upward. Both genders, reached almost the same amount of physical exercise in age 65 and over (about 47%).
All in all, it is clear that man have more physical activity under 24 years old than women and above the age of 24, this trend would be reversed and women spend more attention on their physical activity and even their health.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83850931677 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51062323778 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7203662798 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412332974801 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200123783697 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885550251199 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247950133687 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651946608185 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.