The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
The given pie-charts illustrate the proportional data providing the online sales of four products in the Canadian retail market over a period of 5 years from 2005 to 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the sales figure of Electronics and appliance, and home furnishings witnessed a significant decline, while video games and food and beverage section observed a substantial increase.
To begin with, in 2005, the majority of the sales were from Electronic and appliances, which accounted for 35% of the total sales. The next most demanding section was home furnishings, with a quarter of the overall figure. By contrast, 4% fewer sales were reported in the video games section as compared to food and beverage that made up 22% of the total share.
Turning to 2010, with 5% and 10% drop down, sales in the electronic and appliance and home furnishings plunged to 30% and 15% respectively. However, whilst food and beverage experienced a noticeable surge of 10%, a further 5% rise pushed the video games market up, reaching 23% by the period end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
- The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 78
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- Some People think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe tat school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0376344086 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79069548133 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3062005812 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156436615396 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074539574078 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880670758289 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106058641543 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957140358697 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.