Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have diverse views about which type of study is the best benefit selection for learners. Some consider studying by themselves as the key to get a good result while others hold the belief that only by working in a team do students effectively achieve their goal. As far as I am concerned, both forms are of equal importance in academic study.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that studying alone brings students a lot of boons. First and foremost, if they learn on their own they will not be distracted by peers’ opinions. In addition, it may a good chance for them to deal with their assignments and problems without any supports, thus developing their critical thinking and training the virtue of independence. Secondly, self-learning allows them to study in a flexible way, meaning that they can work whenever and wherever is convenient, and they can cover at their own pace. For example, the average students would not keep up with the outperform ones if they work in a group. As a result, there would be a sharp decline in the formers’ academic achievements.
On the other hand, working in a group has a more important role to play in the schooling of children. The main benefit is that this form has thorough insight into an issue. Indeed, two heads are better than one. When children are challenged to work through tasks together, they easily figure out the answer to a question, which not only enhance study yield but also improve interpersonal skill preparing them to work in their future career. Another merit is that team study boosts learners’ motivation to keep up with their classmates. For example, learning with top-notch students would stimulate others’ spirit of learning that makes them more studious and willing to learn. Last but not least, this learning method develops virtues’ community spirit such as modesty, patience. For instance, when members are in contradiction with each other, they learn how to control their ego to compromise to gain mutual benefit.
All things considered, my firm conviction is that studying alone is as important as team study. Therefore, much attention should be paid to both forms to aid students in getting their hoped scores.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | kwchung | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-12 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 89
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 89
- Immigration has a major impact on the society What are the main reasons of immigration To what consequences can it lead 11
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 416, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a flexible way" with adverb for "flexible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dly, self-learning allows them to study in a flexible way, meaning that they can work whenever an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...average students would not keep up with the outperform ones if they work in a group. As a resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96216216216 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68363000022 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586486486486 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0684305795 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6315789474 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275639239596 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772339293214 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055131225813 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170074169783 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534509243712 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.