The table illustrates the number of international tourists in the leading eight nations in two years 2009 and 2010 and the change.
It is evident that France was visited the most among other countries in both years. While tourist arrivals in Germany increased significantly, that of Hong Kong plummeted from 2009 to 2010.
Starting at 76 millions visitors in 2009, the figure of France took the lead and remained stable in the following year. The international traveler arrivals to the US accounted for the second highest number and rose slightly by 1.5%. Meanwhile, the statistics on Spain and UK were equal at 55 millions in 2009, growing by 1.8% and 3.6% respectively.
There was a minimal change in the number of visitors to Italy from 44 millions in 2009 to 45 millions in 2010. In contrast, Turkey and China saw an enormous growth of 33% and 55% accordingly. While the figure for Germany climbed substantially by 109% which was the largest increased change compared to other countries, that of Hong Kong experienced a downward trend to 9 millions in 2010.
The table illustrates the number of international tourists in the leading eight nations in two years 2009 and 2010 and the change.
It is evident that France was visited the most among other countries in both years. While tourist arrivals in Germany increased significantly, that of Hong Kong plummeted from 2009 to 2010.
Starting at 76 millions visitors in 2009, the figure of France took the lead and remained stable in the following year. The international traveler arrivals to the US accounted for the second highest number and rose slightly by 1.5%. Meanwhile, the statistics on Spain and UK were equal at 55 millions in 2009, growing by 1.8% and 3.6% respectively.
There was a minimal change in the number of visitors to Italy from 44 millions in 2009 to 45 millions in 2010. In contrast, Turkey and China saw an enormous growth of 33% and 55% accordingly. While the figure for Germany climbed substantially by 109% which was the largest increased change compared to other countries, that of Hong Kong experienced a downward trend to 9 millions in 2010.
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to the developing countries in the period from 2006 to 2010 by the US UK charities to support technological development Overall it is evident that most of the countries experienced an increase during the gi 73
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essence of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot be overlooked 89
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from The given line chart illustrates how many visits to Australia each year by fo 49
- It is true that many art galleries and historical buildings are primarily visited by people from other regions not the locals While there are several reasons to account for this phenomenon some measures should be taken to make these places more attractive 61
- the first man to walk on the moon said it was a great step for mankind But space travel has made little difference in most people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wo years 2009 and 2010 and the change. It is evident that France was visited th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Hong Kong plummeted from 2009 to 2010. Starting at 76 millions visitors in 2009...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...growing by 1.8% and 3.6% respectively. There was a minimal change in the number...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79935508446 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9026296373 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512741824711 0.215688989381 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191860084319 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166924419544 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336240686546 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183839638984 0.0819641961636 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.