The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The claim that young people have to be prepared for leadership with a sense of cooperation and not competition cannot be agreed upon. There are many factors and examples that say otherwise, a few of which are explained below.
Firstly, a sense of competition is very important in life. A healthy competition is always a good thing. Considering the preparedness of young people to become leaders, competitions will make them more involved in this whole process. It will be a challenging task for them, making them more eager to wanting to win. All this leads to them putting in more efforts and having better outcomes. For example, if two people are asked to paint a picture together. They would just do it based on their interest. If the same two people were asked to participate in a painting competition, they would work harder and try to make their painting the best. This is because winning in a competition would make more confident and prove that they are better. Winning would also bring them recognition, whereas none of this would matter if they were simply asked to paint something together.
Secondly, when young people are competing to become leaders, they might reach a point where they would face a lot of hurdles or struggles. This would be a good way for them to overcome difficult situations, making them stronger. All these would count as good experiences for them even before becoming leaders, giving them a better understanding of handling things and to be ready for any kind of obstacles.
Thirdly, it is not entirely wrong to have a sense of cooperation too. As cooperation makes them understand people better and be ready to work with different people for different stuff. It also makes them understand things from other peoples perspective, making them empathetic.
In conclusion, though instilling a sense of cooperation in young people to prepare them for leadership, competition makes them more ready to face challenges and struggles. It keeps them ready for unforseen situations which is very important for a leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: EAGER_TO[1]
Message: With 'eager to', use the base form of the verb: 'want'.
Suggestion: want
...ask for them, making them more eager to wanting to win. All this leads to them putting ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, whereas, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 342.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01461988304 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78500905477 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476608187135 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7259526056 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267048923447 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951631413885 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749510383988 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196754091834 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801024649445 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.