Some people claim that a nations's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
The consequences and repercussions of our daily activities are detrimental to the biodiversity, and threaten the health of the land we all live on. We conveniently ignore the harmful consequences of many undertaken actions to animals, flowers, but also to our peers. A plethora of reasons explain these behaviours: sheer egoism, the proclivity of enjoying anything at disposition, ignorance translating into an insouciance for what will happen in future, and the unacknowledged feeling that the temporal benefits we derive from such investments far outweigh the potential fallouts.
It is then essential to always keep in mind that the so called wilderness areas are what permit humans to live in conducive conditions for their growth as individuals and as a whole. In only two decades, hundred millions of hectares have however been deforested for the only purpose of mercenary gains. Trees provide us with Co2 allowing us to breathe, oceans are the source of our second best need, drinking, lands are the grounds of beautiful mosques and cathedrals, of our houses, and eclectic environments present us means to fulfil our nutritive whims. In hindering the proper development of these natural entities, we cause harm to the future generations. Thus, it comes under the responsibility of governments not only to preserve the wilderness areas but also deter the concerned stakeholders from pursuing these modifications.
One cannot either overlooks the respect that these areas deserve independently of the relationship that bound them to us. Despite the fact that most people assert that the human life prevails over any other form, governments or enterprises should not pretend have the right to jeopardise the well-being of wild animals and protected lands. Firstly, because of environment for the essential, abides out of the human commercial trades and there is no need for us to impinge upon wilderness areas. On the other hand, it would also be akin to ranking the life's value between different species. The life of dogs and cats would then significantly worth, while white bears are of scant importance. By enacting laws in favour of environment’s protection, governments but also international institutions would preserve it.
The debate might even extend to the pleasant aspects of these areas, whose bucolic beauty and unique characteristics are what constitute the truly essence of our planet. Not only the aesthetes benefit from them, but they also provide an important source of incomes. Economic gain through tourism, for instance, flow from these areas.
Insofar, wilderness areas should be developed for potential economic gain, entrepreneurs and government must find a common ground to do it on behalf of all the species that could be affected by it, and, more generally, not on the altar of our environment. Business areas having been modified a great number of times or financial processes altering along the evolution of the mankind, are testament to the fact that economy, despite Earth, is the result of an amalgamation of human's knowledge and implementations. As institutions and governments are also able to provide informations on the interstellar system, can send people in different planets, they must be able to transition our economic pattern into something more viable. It may sound quixotic and opponents would argue that wars, for instance, are deleterious as well, but the emergency we are all facing urge all of us to reshuffle the ways we think and behave.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | joenen | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-27 | joenen | 66 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | amateraasu | 79 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | enchanted11 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | enchanted11 | 50 | view |
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability 85
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 75
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 83
- The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint 79
- Students should memorize facts only after they have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nto an insouciance for what will happen in future, and the unacknowledged feeling that th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: 'hundred million'.
Suggestion: hundred million
...ls and as a whole. In only two decades, hundred millions of hectares have however been deforested f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ls and as a whole. In only two decades, hundred millions of hectares have however been ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'second the best'.
Suggestion: second the best
...o breathe, oceans are the source of our second best need, drinking, lands are the grounds o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...ments or enterprises should not pretend have the right to jeopardise the well-being ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2950.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 556.0 442.535393258 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30575539568 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03022701495 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570143884892 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 922.5 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0469567002 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.476190476 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4761904762 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284818207023 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728338800923 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073851780581 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137916002824 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740711254663 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.