The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:
"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. The result is an increase in assaults, property damage, and disruptions of normal pedestrian traffic. In order to address this growing problem, the council must ban cell phone use on sidewalks. Not only do people texting or using their phones slow down pedestrian traffic, but they are also more likely to walk into the road or bump into other walkers. Children are especially vulnerable because they are too short to be easily seen. Middletown passed such a ban and not only have they heard no complaints, but the reported incidents of sidewalk crime has gone down significantly."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The newsletter states that engaging undergraduate and graduate students in community services would help them gain real-world working experience and would also help local charities at the same time. The assumption made over here is lacking concrete evidence since engaging in charity work won't necessarily help students since there can be many discrepancies while they would be a part of it.
Firstly, the argument has a vague description of the real-world working experience since there is no proper understanding of what kind of role would be provided by the local charities as well as it's not necessary that they would give them some work where they would have to deal with the clients or have to collect people for the work. This shows how they would lack in providing the students with real-world experience as the role provided to them may vary.
Secondly, the argument doesn't take the students mood into consideration as there would be some of them who would just do the work for completing the graduation since it's necessary for them and this would lead to a lack of enthusiasm and concern which can affect the charities progress at the same time.
Moreover, It's not necessary that all the students can get work in the charities since they didn't mention the number of seats available or the number of charities that would be willing to work with them which would leave some of the students with no work and can affect their graduation.
All in all, there are many factors which are not been considered while making the assumption since it's not necessary that every student would be willing to do the work with full energy, at the same time this would not necessarily help them with the kind of experience the university is trying to provide them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | megha tomar | 58 | view |
| 2020-11-13 | rakshit0369 | 16 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | brandon.payne20 | 66 | view |
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy 50
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hem may vary. Secondly, the argument doesnt take the students mood into considerati...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... Secondly, the argument doesnt take the students mood into consideration as there would ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...an get work in the charities since they didnt mention the number of seats available o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ing to work with them which would leave some of the students with no work and can affect th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87043189369 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5589074224 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435215946844 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8529410553 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.428571429 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 23.4991977007 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.21951772744 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0196601291766 0.243740707755 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0143557050093 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0101655053663 0.0758088955206 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0142275427369 0.150359130593 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120280226893 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hem may vary. Secondly, the argument doesnt take the students mood into considerati...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... Secondly, the argument doesnt take the students mood into consideration as there would ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...an get work in the charities since they didnt mention the number of seats available o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ing to work with them which would leave some of the students with no work and can affect th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87043189369 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5589074224 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435215946844 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.8529410553 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.428571429 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.0 23.4991977007 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.21951772744 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0196601291766 0.243740707755 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0143557050093 0.0831039109588 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0101655053663 0.0758088955206 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0142275427369 0.150359130593 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120280226893 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.