It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.
Opinions vary with the regard to the question whether narrow or diverse specialization has any difference on the quality of knowledge. Although specialization has its benefits, the broad knowledge is difficult to overestimate. The diverse knowledge increases the chances to find a dream job and fosters the ability to broad personal horizons.
The narrow specialization enables the students to master their majors, reducing the time spent on useless subjects. By focusing on a few number of subjects students are able to concentrate on narrow topics and develop special skills. To be specific, some jobs require specific qualifications in the fields such physics or math. The employers in such industries as banking or finance require not just basic skills, but specific knowledge as financial modelling or financial analyses. Also, the high competition among graduates from schools reduces the chances to get a job for an employees without requested skills.
By the same token, despite clear benefits of narrow specialization, the widespread knowledge raises the ability of students to find their path. For example, by taking more classes and studying more subjects undergraduates can find themselves. Moreover, different classes are designed to help students understand their strengths and weaknesses, according to which undergraduates may manage their personal curricula. Mankind usually realizes the lost opportunities or regrets on made choices in the time when they can change a little. I firmly believe, that wide knowledge creates several opportunities for students, who have not decided on their future yet, and reduces the chances to regret on taken decisions.
Furthermore, the broad knowledge allows students to adapt in the dynamic world. In the era of high technology boom and development of artificial intelligence those who do not adapt quickly become unclaimed. Conscious choices which students make in their schools can define their ability to absorb information and transform it into the quality of life. To be specific, nowadays we see the difficulties among previous generations to find jobs as their skill become obsolete, which are highly concentrated on specific skills such as manufacturing or farming. The lack of convertible skills, which could be used not only in outgoing industries, but also in created from scratch, create the most difficulties for those, who choose the specialise rather than to have a broad knowledge.
All in all, the broad knowledge inculcates us the ability to understand the world from different angles. Conscious choices made in the schools let undergraduates to develop their internet talents and become prepared for life.
- Private collectors 86
- In the past several years a number of technological advances have made laser eye surgery more widely available 3
- communal encyclopaedias 80
- Organic food 75
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions vary with the regard to the question whether narrow or diverse specialization has an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...t on useless subjects. By focusing on a few number of subjects students are able to concen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
...ls reduces the chances to get a job for an employees without requested skills. By the same...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for example, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55733333333 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05560206833 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9464733132 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.684210526 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156116543317 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051120362794 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479297742951 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876681235732 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375726113336 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.