Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy; even though they cause damage to the environment.
I totally disagree with the above statement that environmental protection policies should not be implemented on the MNCs because of they generate profit and boost the economy of the nation. I think that laws should be same for everyone because protection of the environment is as important as profit and economic growth. If the air we breathe isn’t clean then what is the use of profit and economic growth.
There is a saying “Health is wealth”. It states that good health is more important in life than the wealth you posses in terms of money etc. So if we allow the MNCs to run without any environmental protection policies it would the environment very badly. For example, in Agra due to the toxic gases given out of the industries the color of Taj Mahal marble turned quiet yellow. So to lower this degradation local government had to put Environmental protection policies on the MNCs near Taj Mahal.
The toxic gases and the waste material given out of the MNCs will have direct and indirect impact on our day to day life. For example, the waste thrown out of the MNCs will be sent to the local water bodies which will lead to water pollution. This will harm the aquatic life and also the water which we drink will be impure. Previously, there was news about extinction of Coral Reefs in Australia due to the waste material thrown from the MNCs. Similarly, the air will breathe will get polluted and would lead to many health and breathing problems.
Even the governments have taken initiatives to control the pollution from the MNCs. Like in India the Modi government in India has taken measures to control the pollution done by MNCs by starting “Swatch Bharat Abhiyan”. Even the MNCs nowadays are shifting towards zero carbon emission by producing recyclable products for the pollution control. Also carmakers are doing research and development to control the toxic gas emission from the cars. Even governments are implementing certain norms on carmakers like usage of BS6 engines etc.
So at last I want to conclude by saying that economic growth is a crucial part of our life but at the same time protecting our environment is also equally important because what will you do of the money and the wealth you posses if you don’t have proper health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | CHAITRALI PHATAK | 50 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | Madmix1234 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | CHAITRALI PHATAK | 58 | view |
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 66
- Policies that focuses on protecting environment should not be imposed on multinational organizations as they generate profit and boost the economy even though they cause damage to the environment 30
- To better serve the international students being admitted to Rydell College we should build a new cafeteria catering to the students at subsidized rates The current cafeteria is very old and serves only expensive items and dishes a point that will surely 55
- The following memorandum is from the manager of Bagel Mania Bakery Recently Bagel Mania replaced sugar with saccharin a sugar substitute throughout its bakeries in the Northeast areas of the USA Contrary to initial expectations this change did not have an 70
- The value of money should be instilled into youngsters since childhood because social success is defined by the amount of money one has 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...s should not be implemented on the MNCs because of they generate profit and boost the economy o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 346, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ble products for the pollution control. Also carmakers are doing research and develo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, then, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58996838552 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488491048593 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.770161274 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154512235668 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531294885448 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822417978004 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096273860108 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107459688736 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.