In the future, it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this a positive or negative development?
Without a shadow of a doubt, with afoot progression and augmentation in societies, human beings are encountering new miscellaneous upheaval-causing problems. One of which is nothing but the decline of the natality rate, bringing about the most portion of a country become senior citizens. Needless to say that it highly likely causes some irreparable damages; accordingly, it is a negative point. In the following, we discuss succinctly.
First and foremost, the more the people become old, the high the number of GPs, standing for general practitioners, is required. With the increase of age, people would suffer from various maladies. To this end, it is a desideratum that government provides more doctors and nurses. For instance, the result of a survey conducted by MIT's researchers evinces that in Japan, which has the highest proportion of older people in the world, governments have to disburse a bundle of money for training new health cadres. Moreover, the amount of drugs which is exercised by patients considerably escalates.
Secondly, people can have the best throughput till a specific age, after that their abilities exorbitantly deteriorate. When nations face this phenomenon, they will lose their rank in the world trades, intuitively giving rise to depending on other countries to provide for them the initial commodities. Moreover, by losing the young workforces, it might be conquered with other countries if war breaks out. To the best of the author's knowledge, Vietnam could win the war against America thanks to having juvenile forces.
To briefly recapitulate, we can see that having a country which is full of elders just begets some problems without bringing a profit. To boil down the essay, it can be said: (1) the government has to supply more doctors and medicines, (2) the country will lose its performance in comparison to nation and thread with them, too.
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
- Nowadays some people think that public libraries are not necessary, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 89
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s if war breaks out. To the best of the authors knowledge, Vietnam could win the war ag...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ome problems without bringing a profit. To boil down the essay, it can be said: 1 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96965697255 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1024831884 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189053365083 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050468595079 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327608560508 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102046625161 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103912620071 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s if war breaks out. To the best of the authors knowledge, Vietnam could win the war ag...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ome problems without bringing a profit. To boil down the essay, it can be said: 1 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96965697255 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1024831884 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189053365083 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050468595079 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327608560508 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102046625161 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103912620071 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.