Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress. Do you agree or disagree
For the development of a nation, some people think that it is better if government allocate money on science on priority basis rather than other subjects. I think funding on this subject will bring enormous pros but I also feel that all subjects have its own importance. This essay will discuss role of all subjects to the learner.
To begin with, I feel science education is very crucial for the progress of nation in many areas. Development at any phase is always linked with technology. For example without it, information and communication would be impossible. Moreover, if learners do not focus on science and technology, then they not only minimal their chances of exploring in this stream but also, rated their country as an undeveloped country. So, teaching technological literacy, critical thinking and problem solving through science education gives students the skill and knowledge they need for the betterment of their nation in future.
However, I also consider all subjects are equal. Therefore it is vital that authorities give proper and equal funding to all subjects. Pupil comes to school in order to better themselves in every field like mathematics, arts, language, history, and etcetera. Furthermore, Studying such streams enhance their knowledge, communication skills and moral values. Hence, learning every subject not only bring holistic development but also helps to find out their inner capabilities which they might pursue in their future. Besides this, restricting students to one subject would never develop their multiple abilities and skills As a consequence; they will study as an obligation rather than with interest.
In conclusion, although science and technology is an essential l tool for rapid development, but I feel in this competitive world a learner should have knowledge of all streams for the career and economy of a nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | c0758910@mylambton.ca | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | harsimrankaur26 | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-23 | geetuvirk | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-04 | MyNguyen | 87 | view |
- Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children 67
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this set a bad example for young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people thinks that government should increase tax on unhealthy food to encourage people to start eating healthy Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...need for the betterment of their nation in future. However, I also consider all subjects...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...I also consider all subjects are equal. Therefore it is vital that authorities give prope...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30976430976 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83689165996 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3801461219 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16201688907 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531978221032 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698578921682 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104806328364 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783705532617 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.