Some people think that the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects to make progress. Do you agree or disagree?
Technology is the fuel behind today’s every major advancement, and science is the main power that drives the development of technology. So, there is no dispute that science is an extremely important subject, and that government should spend more money on it than other subjects is an increasingly popular opinion. However, I disagree with this sentiment.
Undoubtedly, teaching science to children is essential. Science is the study of the world around us, from a simple problem like how to calculate to a complex subject like rocket science. New discovery about our world is happening every day, so to help the youngster to keep up with the changing world, science subjects like math, chemical and physic are crucial.
However, the human brain has two sides: the left side for science and the right side for creativity. Education, like the human brain, need to be taught in both. Other than science, there are a lot of indispensable subjects like literature or art that also help to develop the world. If there was no art, the world wouldn’t have seen brilliants artists like Van Gogh or Picasso, and if there was no music, the world wouldn’t have Mozart. In this alternative universe without art, the world would be so dull.
Moreover, not every child is good at science. Each person has his old strengths and weaknesses, a child good at math is not necessarily good at drawing and vice-versa. Because of that, teaching methodology and subjects must be designed in a way that could develop both. For example, my brother is not comfortable with numbers, but he has extraordinary drawing skills. If his study was not included subjects like drawing and art, he would have never been able to discover his talent and pursuit his dream to become an artist.
In conclusion, child development should be equal for both sides: science and creativity. Thus, the government should distribute its educational fund equally. Only by doing that, we, the human race, are able to fulfill our potential and help to create a better world for everybody.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98538011696 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7103559817 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546783625731 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8714561075 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7368421053 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166893717251 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053265924697 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636895046608 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104771981568 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731041907235 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.