The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
The given map plan outlines the comparison of public park when it was built in 1920 and today after the succession of reconstruction of park with modern facilities.
In details, in 1920, when park was built there was two main entrance Arnold avenue and Eldon street, but street was remain unchanged, however the old stage for musician was replaced with modern building and with big area in the same place with the name of Amphitheater for concert. Similarly, the fountain which was in the middle of the park was substitute by beautiful rose garden surrounded with seating facilities for people. Before rose garden was located in three place of park, but now there are only 2 rose garden, another was in the same place, near to the left side of Arnold avenue. Furthermore, in the old park there was pond for water plant , now it was changed to modern beautiful pond in the opposite of old place y replacing glasshouse.
Additionally, three new facilities are added in modern park, the café next to the Arnold entrance by replacing one rose garden and children’s play area in the place of old pond. As well as, in the right corner of Eldon street, underground car park entrance was constructed for the parking facilities.
Overall, as compared to old and new public park, some facilities are at the same place with no any changes and some are reconstructed with modern facilities, while some facilities are removed by added facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The bar chart shows British Emigration selected to destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...avenue and Eldon street, but street was remain unchanged, however the old stage for mu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... old park there was pond for water plant , now it was changed to modern beautiful ...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e facilities are at the same place with no any changes and some are reconstructed ...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re reconstructed with modern facilities, while some facilities are removed by add...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88211382114 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6729050329 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483739837398 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8501294982 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.125 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149912701864 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880982475695 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672979070185 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129021864088 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742941227426 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.