The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph depicts the consumption of chicken, beef, lamb and fish in grams per individual European per week from 1979 to 2004 with 5 years of interval.
Overall, it can be manifested that in the beginning, beef was consumed the most, say in 1979, then it plummeted gradually throughout the timeline. Whereas the consumption of fish remains almost unchanged. Surprisingly the consumption of chicken and lumb was almost equal but then after consumption of chicken represent upward stream while lamb shows downward stream.
Firstly, the consumption of chicken was the highest(225 grams) among all given foods in 1979, after falling sharply it was on the pick in 1983 by representing graph at 240 grams. Then it gradually plummeted and reached to the level of 110 grams in 2004.
Secondly, chicken and lamb showed an equal amount of consumption(150 grams) in 1979, but after that, they both show the different trends, the former one levelled up and reached to the highest level among all in 2004, it was 260 grams whereas the letter one shows a different trend and plummeted to the level of 70 grams in the year 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how the cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- Scientists believe that the world is in danger due to environmental changes Some people say that personal lifestyle changes should be made to reduce the damages to environment while other think that the government should do something to help Discuss both 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eted gradually throughout the timeline. Whereas the consumption of fish remains almost ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91578947368 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65357126213 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.723061461 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227205979374 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107694436861 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562161424534 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147459150447 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402618376097 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.