The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays the internet has influenced social interaction of people in the globe scale. People don't even have to step out of the room to communicate with foreigners and to get acquainted with their life style. However, I strongly disagree with the idea that people do not need travelling to immerse in unfamiliar culture and I am going to provide several arguments.
To begin with, the internet allways presents a little bit biased information because of political agenda. If you want to avoid misconceptions, you should acquire practical experience.
Secondly, nothing brings more pleasure but your own feelings and emotions when you land in alien ambience. For instance, it is a well known fact that tourists visiting the USA are suckers for cowboy hats though it looks rather foolish.
I strongly believe that travelling to other countries to learn about other cultures and life is necessary. This is because it not only helps to clear notions about other cultures but also makes people’s life more adventurous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Now they have an opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- These days consumers are faced with an increasing amount of advertising from various companies Do you agree or disagree 85
- You are planning to donate money to a charity and want it to have a major impact on people Should you donate to a small local group or to a large international organization 90
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- The author of the article suggests that this type of dinosaur was the inactive hunter and preferred to eat dead animals and eggs However the lecture argued that R robustus was an active hunter and could be hunted on other dinosaurs 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f assessment seem to be more effective.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, kind of, sort of, it is true, to sum up, what is more, with regard to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30792682927 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00089064461 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0610130596 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.357142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2142857143 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290550930436 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847891272697 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512181475701 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157377861802 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474871348062 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.