Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is an established fact that the measuring index of the industrial revolutions (from first to the fourth) is technology. Sequel to the discovery of an unprecedented working machine, the world respond by identifying such inventions as industrial revolutions in which we are in the fourth era of such propensity. A plebian belief that brought about the advancement of industrial era was the notion of "easier work and better results" as a result of the inventions created. As such, the statement which claimed that the supposed aim of technology -which is to make lives better- have been ironical -by making lives difficult- is one I strongly disagree with for two reasons.
To begin with, the earth has always been seen as complicated from time immemorial. Ranging from the geographical confusion on the shape of the earth, the calculations of time zones to the development of a working life for all, humans have always seen the earth as a cornucopia of mysterious notions. However, the advent of technology has helped create a paradigm in our definitions of complexities. Technology has helped humans transcend from their benighted and parochial approaches to the world quandaries. For instance, diseases such as polio was once perceived as insurmountable by the 18th and 19th centuries humans and as such lots of lives were lost based on lack of necessary resources to tackle the world's ravaging diseases in time pasts. Nevertheless and quite fortunately, technology helped scientists discovered the best approach of immunization and swift supply of drugs to help eradicate the scourge of polio from the world. Can we imagine a world where polio coexist with the COVID-19 pandemic? It would be disastrous to say the least. The illustration above clearly show that technology did not complicate human lives but has helped humans come out from being imperiled by providing needed resources to tackle problem on a diverse scale.
Flowing from the coronavirus pandemic that was briefly compared in the illustration above, it is evident that technology has been a crucial part in the containment of the virus that has been ravaging humanity. Through technology, the virus -with a pretty high transmission rate- could be easily detected using PCR -an application of nanotechnology in medicine- which has undoubtedly help in curtailing the spread of the virus. In addition, despite the necessary "stay at home" policy due to the COVID-19 pandemic, lots of businesses are still in operation where virtual meetings via zoom, google meet, Microsoft Team has become the new order of the day. In fact, humans are beginning to comment and affirmed how enjoyable and productive it has been working from home with no worries on traffic or related logistics associated with going to work on a daily basis. Unarguably, the economy of the world would be described saved from apocalyptic events where we try to introspect of what the state of the world would have been in the absence of technology during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Finally, it is however crucial to state that technology has rather made lives complicated by creating problems that might have been inconceivable for the world. For example, various cancer diseases have been linked to radioactive reactions -a constituent of technology. Nuclear weapons invented has also been one of the most prominent reasons for global conflicts among others. However, the paradox of the complications of technology are also resolved by using the same technological approaches. The most effective way of treating cancer for example can be linked to technology. As such, technology has only made human lives develop and advanced beyond our widest imaginations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-06 | wiloj50 | view | |
| 2022-08-15 | 000Nittykvn000 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | 000Nittykvn000 | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | sag15 | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | MKC | 58 | view |
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 75
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 83
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 96
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: ESTABLISHED_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'a fact'.
Suggestion: a fact
It is an established fact that the measuring index of the industr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 749, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...worlds ravaging diseases in time pasts. Nevertheless and quite fortunately, technology helpe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...logy in medicine- which has undoubtedly help in curtailing the spread of the virus. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3126.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 594.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26262626263 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93681225224 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99439821333 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 305.0 215.323595506 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513468013468 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 976.5 704.065955056 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2543364564 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157965761407 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048429889534 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610693585232 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104274529114 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445279686631 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 176.0 100.480337079 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.