Do you think it is better to start learning a new language as an infant, as a child, or as a teenager? Provide reasons and examples to support your stance.
It is claimed that people suppose to study a foreign language from scratch at different ages. For example, when babies are only up three years, when children are toddlers, or when they are adolescents. I am confident it would be better if all kids will start to pick up a new language for them as soon as possible. Ranges of resources suggest including a second or a third language into children's educational development because it will be effortless for them. Nevertheless, it is essential to think beforehand about the mental pressure on infants as well as about their physical development.
Undoubtedly, infants could acquire two or more languages unconsciously because they could live in a bilingual area. Children naturally absorb several languages when parents use two languages or more in their daily activities, or where at home, members of the family use one language, but they use another language in the external environment. Along with that, it is imperative to notice that kids use curiosity to satisfy their requirements to understand people around them.
Indeed, lucky children who will be born in bilingual or three lingual realms because everything will help them assimilate knowledge about languages. In contrast, it would be tough to organize a comprehensive language curricular program for kids born in a family where all members speak the one native language. Equally important to think about children's pressure when parents try to develop the proficiency for academic language if children do not have the hard-wired talent to acquire languages.
In addition, infants who learn two languages could start to speak late; for instance, boys could start to mumble only at four years, but simultaneously on two languages. If parents do not develop two languages, kids could lose their native language; they could speak this language but cannot read and write. By the same token, it would be difficult to maintain both languages because of the complexity of languages and their specifics. In practice, children who make an effort to learn languages professionally, for example, eloquent speech, well-rounded reading, rich writing, and good listening, will achieve great success.
In the final analysis, we could notice the advantages and disadvantages of acquiring several languages in young years. Clearly, to learn two languages is not a children’s decision; that is why parents should think a lot about how they could provide an opportunity to pick up two languages for their children.
- Some people believe that children should spend all of their free time with their families Others believe that this is unnecessary or even negative Discuss the possible argument on both sides and say which side you personally support 89
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- Most citizens have the right to vote What do you believe is the type of background best suited for someone who will become a national leader A business background B legal background C military background 90
- The chart gives a more detailed look at changes in the consumption of such personal items as stereos tennis racquets perfumes CDs toys and photographic films in four selected European countries 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... members speak the one native language. Equally important to think about childrens pres...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as well as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92745196374 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8749620183 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.235294118 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16282411562 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590114131259 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431651543047 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103138151405 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364620241832 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.