Do you think it is better to start learning a new language as an infant, as a child, or as a teenager? Provide reasons and examples to support your stance.
It is claimed that people suppose to study a foreign language from scratch at different ages. Opinions vary on whether when babies are only up three years, when children are toddlers, or when they are adolescents. I am confident it would be better if all kids will start to pick up a new language for them as far in advance as possible.
Undoubtedly, infants could acquire two or more languages unconsciously because they could live in a bilingual area. Ranges of resources suggest including a second or a third language into children's educational development because it will be effortless for them. Children naturally absorb several languages when parents use two languages or more in their daily activities. Along with that, it is imperative to notice that kids use curiosity to satisfy their requirements to understand people around them. Nevertheless, it is essential to think beforehand about the mental pressure on infants and their physical development.
Indeed, lucky children who will be born in bilingual or three lingual realms because everything will help them assimilate knowledge about languages. In contrast, it would be tough to organize a comprehensive language curriculum for kids born in a family where all members speak the one native language. Equally important, by thinking about children's pressure, when parents try to develop academic language proficiency if children do not have the hard-wired talent to acquire languages.
In addition, infants who learn two languages could start to speak later; for instance, boys could start to mumble only at four years, but simultaneously on two languages. Whether parents do not develop two languages, kids could lose their native language; they could speak this language but cannot read and write. By the same token, it would be difficult to maintain both languages because of the complexity of languages and their specifics. In practice, children who make an effort to learn languages professionally, for example, eloquent speech, well-rounded reading, rich writing, and good listening, will achieve outstanding success.
In the final analysis, it appears that children should start to learn a new language before two years old. Clearly, we could find many advantages of this decision, such as simultaneously learning two and more languages and developing language skull effortlessly. Nonetheless, to learn two languages is not a children's decision; that is why parents should think a lot about how they could provide an opportunity to pick up two languages for their children.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- You are planning to donate money to a charity and want it to have a major impact on people Should you donate to a small local group or to a large international organization 90
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 60
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 60
- The garph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... members speak the one native language. Equally important, by thinking about childrens ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36408977556 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96413387666 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521197007481 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.183117054 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.5 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184300572494 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678131173698 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465956331664 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113590799189 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459453042138 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... members speak the one native language. Equally important, by thinking about childrens ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36408977556 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96413387666 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521197007481 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.183117054 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.5 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184300572494 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678131173698 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465956331664 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113590799189 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459453042138 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.