Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Currently there is a contentious argument over whether keeping pets at home is a good option or a bad option for children. While pets can be a constant companion for kids at home however, they can also create a constant mess at home. In this essay I will elaborate both the views and discuss that why I think that keeping pets is a good option for increasing the cognitive development of kids.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rational reasons that support the idea of keeping pet animals at home for kids. All children need a partner in crime at home with whom they can play and express their emotions of care and warmth. Since fathers are busy in their daily jobs and mothers are involved in household chores therefore, babies who spend time playing with pets are likely to develop both mentally and emotionally. For instance, studies have shown that kids having any pets at home were more likely to become empathetic towards animals in general and have less depressive and anxiety issues than single children.
On the contrary others believe that domesticating animals such as dogs and cats is harmful for a baby’s safety and is also unhygienic. Sometimes a naughty kid might raise an angry reaction in the form of dog bite by constantly irritating a pet dog. These kinds of injuries could leave a lifelong injury mark and might cause serious injuries to kids. Moreover, maintaining hygiene is another issue faced by pet owners. Dog or cat excreta can cause unhealthy environment for kid’s growth. If the excreta of dog are not cleaned than it might cause bacterial growth and create an unsafe environment for the kids at home.
In conclusion, I believe that domesticating pets at home is a challenging and responsible decision for the parents. However, it is overall beneficial for the emotional and healthy mental state of kids and adults if we take care of the cleanliness and immunization of the pets. Would the pet owners take this responsibility? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-26 | Rajanbir Singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | ankita.hpgdc | 78 | view |
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 67
- Some people support modern developments in agriculture such as factory farming and creation of new types of fruits and vegetables However other people oppose this view Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 52
- In many countries smoking is now illegal in public places Many people believe that such a ban is justified Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85923753666 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66881827126 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1018071742 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207154386236 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672497949698 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698984367789 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125999931913 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791694598075 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85923753666 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66881827126 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560117302053 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1018071742 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207154386236 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672497949698 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698984367789 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125999931913 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791694598075 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.