Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is argued that authorities should enact some rules that put noise into harsh control, while some individuals firmly claim that they have the freedom to make noise as they like. In my opinion, I strongly argue that it would be better to decline loud sound.
On the one hand, some people are more likely to make noise as they want for numerous reasons. Firstly, noise is considered as a mainly part of industrialization and urbanization. To be specific, it is inevitable that loud sound is an evidence as the achievement of development that generated from Industrial Revolution. Secondly, many people recognize that they are prone to work in louder atmosphere rather than more quiet one. For example, studies have shown that there is a people group who is more likely to settle and work in an environment with surrounding noise. This gives rise to benefitical results about the increasing productivity of people who prefer living in morden mega-cities.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that it is more benefitical to impose some laws to strictly control noise. The first reason that the noise is harmful to humankind’s mental and physical health, even to animal’s. To be specific, noise pollution is one of causes to the sharp increase of psychological disorder cases illustrated in public health reports of WHO. In additional, it is considerd as the last reason is some people assume that they struggle to concentrate on working because of the loud of traffic jam that is in street out of their workplaces. Consequently, the productivity of those who work in that environment is more likely to be lower than others who work in more quiet places.
In conclusion, while some individuals claim that it is apparent to have the right to make noise as they want, I strongly argue that the gorvenments should impose some harsh rules to limit impacts of noise for human, especially in urban areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-16 | mbn250 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Lee Daisy | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | harry@uppal | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 73
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('mainly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('part') instead of another adjective.
...easons. Firstly, noise is considered as a mainly part of industrialization and urbanization. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nkind’s mental and physical health, even to animal’s. To be specific, noise pollu...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...illustrated in public health reports of WHO. In additional, it is considerd as the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95327102804 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86148560761 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498442367601 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.840154923 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336320813285 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113533376257 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939011669797 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228706707966 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485975479817 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.