The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Youth violence is a shared social problem. many people thus propose that government need to tackle this issue by controlling the media, whom people see as responsible for inciting this through films and television While youth are undoubtedly swayed by external influences. I disagree that it is a government’s obligation to censor the entertainment industry: rather, it is up to society itself to handle the matter.

Today’s Young people may be influenced by many things, from films to websites to their peers. It is unreasonable, then, to single out films and sitcoms as a main influencer of violence. In other words, Kids may see violence and kindness, greed and generosity, and all other human behaviors in pretty equal measure everywhere. They can witness all of these things in one news broadcast or viral YouTube clip just as easily as they can in action flick. Therefore, blaming the entertainment industry is not only unfair, it is also wrong that it ignores the root causes of certain social behaviors. To suggest that the government can control this to avoid taking responsibility for others.
Indeed, a government’s role is not to act as parents to its citizen, but to maintain order and provide the tools for society to thrive; it should not tell people what they can and cannot do. On the other hand, Parents can and must oversee what their children are exposed to, be it online, in a movie, a book, or any other source. Consequently, Parents must decide whether they want their children to watch a horror movie. It is not the government's duty to ban studios for making it. Furthermore, once we allow the government to engage in censorship in one area, it will be free to act in all spheres of our lives because negative influences are everywhere and have always been so. Restricting, people’s access to media will not stop the violence. In fact, it may increase it as citizens begin to fight for their freedoms.

In conclusion, Social behavior patterns are impacted by many things, including, but not limited to media products, and society should take care control of this. The government should not allow to restrict what films or tv companies produce because they will then have to spread their control to all other areas of society.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-23 KIRTI LIKHI 89 view
2021-04-30 Jahongirdddd 78 view
2021-01-30 Manish Rooprai 67 view
Essays by user Manish Rooprai :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...th violence is a shared social problem. many people thus propose that government nee...
^^^^
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... to watch a horror movie. It is not the governments duty to ban studios for making it. Furt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 194, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'restricting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: restricting
...f this. The government should not allow to restrict what films or tv companies produce beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... control to all other areas of society.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97129186603 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77144617456 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507177033493 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5743283362 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193299436968 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567375793346 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511417939284 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121502291432 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425137265545 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.