The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Undoubtedly, the rate of crime around the globe is up surging insanely. Majority believe it is because of violent scenes in the movies and short episodes, and hence authorities should step in and redact them to control the increasing criminal activities in community. While this is must as it will be a very significant initiative, not to publish the aggressive clips completely is not feasible.

Banning of vicious part from films and television programme by government would definitely be an essential drive, owing to the fact that children today imitate and learn through these shows. To decipher it, some t.v. shows depicts the detailed process of offence and even how culprits escape from the hands of law. Being fascinated by such videos, young adults copy it and started walking down the road of misdeed, which ultimately creates a society of offenders and who will agree to live in aforesaid surroundings? I guess no one. Therefore, leaders of the nations have to set up censor board to edit brutality from videotapes to save the youth from under world and to form a peaceful civilization.

Although expurgating violence from recorded sections is a positive beginning for a better future, eliminating them entirely is not possible. The main reason behind it is, action sequences are not only available in pictures and telecasts but also in various games like PUBGY, FREEFIRE. For instance, youngsters grab the information of wrongdoing from video games too. A boy in Sweden aged 18 killed 42 people in temple after getting influenced by a three dimension interfaces. Moreover, what about the broadcast which have already aired and present on social media. it is almost impossible for higher up to cut all of them and ban other platforms as well.

To sum up, whereas inspecting visual communication to eradicate the vicious content is a must for a peaceful world, however, it is impossible to eradicated it completely.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-23 KIRTI LIKHI 89 view
2021-04-30 Jahongirdddd 78 view
2021-01-30 Manish Rooprai 67 view
Essays by user KIRTI LIKHI :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssive clips completely is not feasible. Banning of vicious part from films and t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 702, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld and to form a peaceful civilization. Although expurgating violence from recor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eady aired and present on social media. it is almost impossible for higher up to c...
^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f them and ban other platforms as well. To sum up, whereas inspecting visual com...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sible to eradicated it completely.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, i guess, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14195583596 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84489072867 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678233438486 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0427271999 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904512411042 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223606524618 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306046555672 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434411266534 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323111646924 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.