Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
We have witnessed technology taking leaps in just a few decades. Technology has advanced so much that now we have mobile phones that bring all of the world into our palm. With an introduction of technology into our lifestyle, this has resulted in some pros and cons especially on the minds of a child in its growing phase.
Children tend to spend more time indoors rather than playing and interacting with others outdoors. Video games or Mobile phones have become their incentives to stay inside the home. Being glued to the screen most of the time inhibits their minds to grow in many other necessary areas such as social interactions with other children, team building and playing sports which enhance their mental and physical health. For example, children who spend more time playing video games miss out on critical thinking they would have developed while playing Legos or puzzles etc. These board games help in brainstorming and thought-evoking processes which is critical in early development of a child and makes a child more creative. However, in the times when there was no technology, children were compelled to do activities that were beneficial for their creative part of the mind.
Children have started reading less and have started watching more TV. Reading books usually trains your mind as you learn new ideas, knowledge about different things, new vocabulary and it opens a new world of wisdom. On the other hand, watching cartoons and movies have made children addicted to them wanting to watch more and more. Children have started running away from books or indulging themselves in sketching, drawing or doing do-it-yourself projects.This has affected their creative aspect of mind. For example, the most notable scientists and artists were from the past who outlined the basics and concepts for us. They were non traditionalists who thought outside the box. They were able to do it because they had an inquisitive mind that searched for answers to their questions from an early age and then they grew into a creative person that brought something revolutionary to the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think that access to so much information creates problems 70
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at now we have mobile phones that bring all of the world into our palm. With an introducti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...rawing or doing do-it-yourself projects.This has affected their creative aspect of m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08670520231 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64402693107 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5126246527 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25753629273 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739376604277 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531395138681 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144361819211 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655921718697 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.