The passage and lecture are both about methods which are used to decrease possibility of declination and extinction of frog’ population. The author elaborates on three methods that help in decreasing of declination of frogs. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She stats no one of these methods can decrease frogs’ extinction.
First, the author claims, frog’ population decrease from using pesticides which spray from farmland into frog habitats, these chemicals cause sever breathing problem to frogs. This point challenged by professor, she says, if law prohibited using of pesticides this will effect growing of crops, in addition decrease in the production of these plants comparing to other farmland.
Second, the writer illustrates to use antifungal medication to kill fungus which infect frogs and cause dehydration of them. The professor contradicts this argument, she mentions, we need to put this medication on frog’ skin individually for each frog, furthermore this medication dose not pass to the offspring, therefore we need to put it continuously, this is a difficult and cost procedure.
Finally, the author believes, many frog habitats threatened by human activity, he suggests decrease using of water or draining of wetland which are using by frogs to lay their eggs will decrease frog extniction, the professor in the other hand rebutes this claim. She states, global warming is the essential cause of decreasing or draining of water, in addition decrease using of water by human being is not perfect decision. Because this will effect human health and growing of crops.
The passage and lecture are both about methods which are used to decrease possibility of declination and extinction of frog’ population. The author elaborates on three methods that help in decreasing of declination of frogs. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She stats no one of these methods can decrease frogs’ extinction.
First, the author claims, frog’ population decrease from using pesticides which spray from farmland into frog habitats, these chemicals cause sever breathing problem to frogs. This point challenged by professor, she says, if law prohibited using of pesticides this will effect growing of crops, in addition decrease in the production of these plants comparing to other farmland.
Second, the writer illustrates to use antifungal medication to kill fungus which infect frogs and cause dehydration of them. The professor contradicts this argument, she mentions, we need to put this medication on frog’ skin individually for each frog, furthermore this medication dose not pass to the offspring, therefore we need to put it continuously, this is a difficult and cost procedure.
Finally, the author believes, many frog habitats threatened by human activity, he suggests decrease using of water or draining of wetland which are using by frogs to lay their eggs will decrease frog extniction, the professor in the other hand rebutes this claim. She states, global warming is the essential cause of decreasing or draining of water, in addition decrease using of water by human being is not perfect decision. Because this will effect human health and growing of crops.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-21 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The passage abd lecture are both discussing the posibility to chanege of keeping pateint medical records from papers to electrical method The writer elaborates on three advantages from using electrical database for keeping patient medical records The lect 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about carved stone ball which are type of artifact found in Scotland The writer claims three diffirent using of this stone ball The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions no one of these 60
- The reading passage and lecturer are both discussing one painting which was or was not painted by Rembrandt The author claims three reason to explain that this paint was not for Rembrandt The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says that all 61
- The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing possibility of replacing of gasoline by ethanol fuel The writer claims three reasons to explain why ethanol is not a good replacement to gasoline However the lecture believes ethanol is a perfect alt 60
- Suitable Career is a crucial concern of all people in the life Individuals try to find job which give them a best benefit Whether people enjoyable more with three days work with long hours or five days a week for short hours This can be weighed in may asp 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... in decreasing of declination of frogs. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ethods can decrease frogs’ extinction. First, the author claims, frog’ populati...
^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rohibited using of pesticides this will effect growing of crops, in addition decrease ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se plants comparing to other farmland. Second, the writer illustrates to use an...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his is a difficult and cost procedure. Finally, the author believes, many frog ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 448, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...not perfect decision. Because this will effect human health and growing of crops.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37007874016 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81089128253 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566929133858 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2762322529 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466788036748 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211135225444 0.0996497079465 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194381571593 0.0662205650399 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310199688614 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.275676934304 0.0443174109184 622% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.