The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960, 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in manufacturing, sales and services sectors in both towns at intervals of fifty years between 1960 and 2010.
It is clear that town A saw the greatest increase in the percentage of people working in the services, while that of employees in the manufacturing in town B had the highest percentage comparison with other sectors.
In the year 1960, the town A experienced the highest percentage of workers in the manufacturing, account for 41% following by sales and services sectors, with 30% and 29% respectively. Nevertheless, the majority of employees at manufacturing in town B is by far higher than the proportion of those working at manufacturing in town A. Besides, the figure for sales and services were lower, at 20% and 10% respectively.
By 2010, there was a significant decrease in the rate of workers in the manufacturing in both towns, most noticeably in town A, fall at 20%. On the other hand, the figure for people working in services sector rise quickly, at 64% in town A and 25% in town B. Finally, a moderate shrink in the percentage of employees was recorded for the sales sector in town A, while that of those working at sales sector in town B and larger percentage comparison with town A, at 22%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-24 | ngannguyen0212 | 67 | view |
- the diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in manufacturing sales and services sectors in both towns at intervals of fifty years between 67
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 78
- Task 2 Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, nevertheless, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73195876289 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03029658901 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438144329897 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2728688406 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476138877069 0.215688989381 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24237127589 0.103423049105 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848269690885 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336577365212 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927555292721 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.