Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.
In the contemporary era, people have different views with regard to the question about an official inmate’s hereafter life. Many opine that when leaving the prison, they may possess a better life and are expected to be good advisors for the youngster in terms of the risk of being a prisoner. From my perspective, I totally agree with the quoted opinion.
Initially, permitting ex-offenders to give advice to the students is definitely have better outcomes in comparison with any other people. It is undeniable that the utterances from a criminal will attract more attention from the teenagers as they could acquire many factual experiences beyond the theory they had learned from their school. Not only that, the youngsters are entitled to freely question the harsh influences of committing a crime and receive valuable advice. Hence, allowing ex-prisoners to share their experiences will assist the next generation have high cognition related to the worth-minding result of a criminal.
Furthermore, organizing some public speaking for ex-offender facilitates more opportunities for them to once come back to society. People who have punished by law may comfortably share their stories with the youngster as they could feel connected to people and there are no boundaries between normal people and the lawbreakers. Hence, they may willing to attempt to contribute to the entire society with an intention to make it gets better. This also a good way for these people to stay away from repeating the old mistakes.
In conclusion, once a prisoner does not mean a lifetime as a prisoner, each individual is worth being treated equally without exception. Hence, with those mentioned reasons, the offender’s experiences enable students to get risk of falling into illegal activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-26 | mahyarr | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | gtuez | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | Maureenchukwu2016 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | ishpinder45 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | hthngn | 61 | view |
- These days only few young people enjoy classical music concerts or play or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 84
- In order to be successful in sports some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 67
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ve advice to the students is definitely have better outcomes in comparison with any ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sk of falling into illegal activities.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33568904594 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91132626985 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6522550147 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166197352321 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539855017818 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561058418323 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910179935901 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543764893855 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.