Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Professional athletes deserve well their enormous salaries. While advocates believe that, many detractors claim this is unequal for other occupations. Both sides of the debate will be considered below.
There are numerous reasons why people support paying high for sports professionals. Firstly, jobs related to sport are short term careers which only last for 5 to 10 years. Therefore, they must earn large amounts of money for their retired periods. Secondly, athletes always face to the risk of injury which may finish their sport lives. For example, a basketball player with a broken arm caused by fouls in the battle could be eliminated from the basketball world forever. Finally, in order to have excellent performances, professional players have to dedicate their lives like timing for families, relationships or hobbies.
On the other hand, opponents think sport players should not be paid much more than others have higher degrees but lower payments. Initially, money can make people change their characteristics, not except for athletes. A rich one may have terrible behaviors for fans and negative lifestyle with drugs and partying. Moreover, if there are too many high paid sport professions, this leads to the far income gap between the rich and the poor. Thus, governments will face to difficulties when suggesting new policies for economies and societies.
In conclusion, professional athletes should have high payments because of their dedications, injury risks and short term incomes. From my point of view, money needs to be spent more for sport salary to serve audiences better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | happyhappy | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Sadrarouhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | morbymuku | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ngannguyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | WIWI UMAR | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 80
- Multinational companies are growing in terms of power and influence. Some argue that they have a negative impact on quality of life.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 70
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these 75
- The chart below shows the percentage of total US population aged 65 and over between 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 45
opponents think sport players should not be paid much more than others have higher degrees but lower payments.
opponents think sport players should not be paid much more than others who have higher degrees but lower payments.
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.75 21.0
No. of Words: 252 350
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.01 0.07
Pay attention to coherence.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 252 350
No. of Characters: 1310 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.984 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.198 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.614 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.737 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.285 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.01 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5