Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better?
It is tempting to view living with parents for a long time as an excellent strategy of young adults’ behavior because they could save money, absorb more knowledge, and understand adulthood better. However, further analysis shows that the better option will be to leave parents’ home as soon as possible and have an independent life.
Clearly, independent life provides young people with many benefits, such as freedom. While one group of juniors should use the rules from their parents or guardians, other adolescents are ready to live alone and establish their own regulations. For example, my sister left the Father’s house when she was 16 and started her life at the university without parents’ care, and she learned how to cook more than 20 dishes in one month. In fact, this background helped her to understand how to make food shortly.
Moreover, life without parents is a fantastic experience when teenagers could make mistakes and learn after these situations. Indeed, the adverb states that people learn from their mistakes. Why is it some essential? The answer is plain to see: young adults exist rebellious behavior, and they should go through their own case. I want to share my own example, my friends who left their roots early than me, have better careers and start their families earlier. It would be unwise to deny, that they absorb advantages and disadvantages of adult life earlier.
Nevertheless, young individuals who could have a chance to stay with their parents as longer as they can contribute many benefits. The striking example is to save money because they should not pay for their apartment or house and pay for food. If young adults stay with their families when they study at the college, it could help them to keep more material benefits for their adult’s life in the future. Students could work and study simultaneously and contribute more to their skills and knowledge while other learners pay for their accommodations.
In the final analysis, it appears that it would be better to live with nuclear family as more as young adults can. So, this solution provides many advantages, such as understanding all aspects of real life, providing significant experience, and learning from their own mistakes. Nonetheless, life with descendants saves budget for young people and contributes more knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-01 | John7A7 | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | tom121 | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | cocoza@gmail.com | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | ayumiyazaki | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-01 | sameep21 | 70 | view |
- It is important to keep old friends than to make new 60
- Due to low cost flights many people are choosing to holiday abroad rather than have holidays in their own country What are the advantages and disadvantages to this 61
- Computer games are a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 70
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying habits in Australian cities
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ce to stay with their parents as longer as they can contribute many benefits. The ...
^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ter to live with nuclear family as more as young adults can. So, this solution pro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13577023499 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6757931232 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3413120203 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.526315789 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391704918613 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12030217166 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703929313597 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226171502768 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041479032439 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.