It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
In today’s hectic life, in order to afford the living expenses and earn a livelihood, people have no choice but to work. There has been a controversial debate about the working conditions in the society whether working longer hour for a limited number of days is better or to work five days a week for a shorter hour. Personally speaking, I think that working shorter hour for five days during a week makes one’s life more acceptable, and the reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that working longer hours consecutively during a day, especially for more than one day, exhaust the body and deplete its energy. Nowadays, people prefer to work in a limited number of hours a day because the tiredness and the lack of energy resulting from working for long hours do not let employees enjoy their off days properly. My own experience can be a compelling example of what I mean. I worked five days in the university from 8 in the morning to 2 in the afternoon. Under such a circumstance, I had free time in my evening after university and could do whatever I wished to do. However, fate put my life in a way such that I now have to work in an office for three whole days which means from 7 in the morning to 7 in the afternoon. Although I have free time the other 4 days and can rest, it is irritating when I think I have to get back to work after off days.
Furthermore, working longer hour even for three days a week have a considerable adverse effect on the quality and quantity of time we can spend with our loved ones. When we work three whole days, we no longer have time during the days to give attention to our family or to do activities our family expect from us. Although we have free time the other four days, either we are resting these days or other members of the family engage in their office or work. As a result, working three whole days, which is out of the norm of society, can loosen the foundation of a family and expose it to unpleasant repercussions. However, working five days a week for shorter hours can provide an opportunity for people to enjoy the free time of the day after their work with their family. Therefore, having the same free time every day as in the evenings can give families a more influential way to strengthen their relationship and deal with their problem.
To put it in a nutshell, having considered all the aforementioned reasons and examples, I do hold the opinion that it is more beneficial for people to work for shorter hours during five days. Not only does it help individuals to save their energy and make their off days more enjoyable, but it also makes an opportunity for people to spend their free time with their family every day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet 73
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 88
- In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 82
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... hour for five days during a week makes ones life more acceptable and the reasons to...
^^^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder The first vital point to bear in mind is...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e to get back to work after off days Furthermore working longer hour even for three days...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, i mean, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38811881188 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46335837763 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4 0.524837075471 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 505.0 20.1344086022 2508% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2216.0 100.406767564 2207% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 505.0 20.6045352989 2451% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 93.0 5.45110844103 1706% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445972883954 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.445972883954 0.076458572812 583% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332934607634 0.150856017488 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542234040236 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 251.7 11.7677419355 2139% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -424.18 58.1214874552 -730% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 197.9 10.1575268817 1948% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.66 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 31.22 8.01818996416 389% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 10.002688172 570% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 204.0 10.0537634409 2029% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 252.0 10.247311828 2459% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.