Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications. Others, however, think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical.
Universities nowadays offer a wide array of subjects that students can choose to specialize in. Due to so much options, there is some confusion as to what a young pupil should study. While some believe that a subject with practical applications is the better choice, others disagree and prefer theoretical subjects. I agree with the former statement, however this essay will explore both views.
The practical skills have always had an important place in our society. The first benefit is that it guarantees job security. There is always a demand for skilled workers, even in times of a global recession. The recent Coronavirus pandemic could be a great example, when a lot of industries shut down but doctors, nurses and factory workers remained in high demand. The other reason for studying a practical subject is that it enables you to innovate and create new technology. This can help create jobs and also bring wealth to the communities. China is a great example of this where new inventions and hard work has lifted many villages out of poverty. Therefore, practical fields are important for human prosperity.
Even though practicality is important, theory can’t be ignored either. Theoretical fields encourage individuals to think and ponder about lots of different things, ranging from life and death to religion and politics. This type of critical analysis of our day to day life has yielded lots of positive changes in our society as today we are better and more progressive than our ancestors. Because of this, we have better human rights, less racism and more tolerance for each other. If it weren’t for these scholars of theoretical subjects, we would never have been able to make progress as a society. Hence, theory is important for a better future for humanity.
In conclusion, although theory is crucial for better understanding of the world, it isn’t suitable to everyone. In my view, the practical subject are better since they guarantee job security and drive innovations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | noahumar | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-11 | nnnqqq | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Hector Padilla | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 42 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The maps below show the city of Stokeford in 1930 and development plans for 2030 67
- The tables below show the reasons for travelling and the main issues for the travelling public 78
- Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications Others however think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical 84
- The graphs below show the number of hours people spent on social media per day from 2010 to 2016 as well as the reasons why they used them 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... can choose to specialize in. Due to so much options, there is some confusion as to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lds are important for human prosperity. Even though practicality is important, t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74173356016 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2964394322 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307891210458 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776309359343 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971698860114 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176117639015 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624926673519 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.