Advantages of working as a team, and argues by the lecturer.
The reading and the lecturer are about whether working in a team is beneficial or not. The reading stated that working as a team is an advantage which the lecturer refutes by arguing that teamwork has some disadvantages. The lecturer supports his arguments by mentioning contribution, quickness of solution on responding to an issue, and influence of some people in the group.
First, according to the reading, people working as a team is beneficial for a company as they together possess a wide range of knowledge and expertise. However, the lecturer claimed that some people show less effort and contribution. When the team did a good job, people who contributed less also benefited from the recognition of the team.
Secondly, the reading stated that people working as a team provided quicker solutions and worked more efficiently than a single individual would. Yet, the lecturer stated that working as a team brought about some issues as a response to projects. Since all the members of the group did not agree upon the solutions, it took time and many conferences to take a decision as a group, therefore, projects did not move as quickly as the reading stated.
Thirdly, the reading stated that working as a team people work more creatively because everyone has different ideas. On the contrary, the lecturer stated that people who influenced more in the team presented their ideas as highly creative. When other members of the team wanted to adjust the idea presented, they were ignored. Consequently, when a project failed, the negative reputation was placed in everyone not individually.
Overall, while the reading stated that working as a team has many advantages, the lecturer contradicts the point presented in the reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | sefeliz | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | 宋致遠 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | Simin_MB | 65 | view |
- Workers who prefer to work four days a week instead of the current hours 71
- Some people choose friends who are different from themselves Others choose friends who are similar to themselves Compare the advantages of having friends who are different from you with the advantages of having friends who are similar to you Which kind of 70
- Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 63
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 75
- COMICS 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g that teamwork has some disadvantages. The lecturer supports his arguments by ment...
^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... influence of some people in the group. First, according to the reading, people ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... move as quickly as the reading stated. Thirdly, the reading stated that working...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15438596491 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83337189697 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0710308598 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432562816326 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166893751604 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128214610988 0.0662205650399 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258845118032 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909825930623 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.