Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may lead to the extinction of animal life and human life. To what extent to you agree of disagree?
These days the demand for wooden products is growing in popularity, resulting in growing deforestation. Some zoologists claim that deforestation is causing to the vanishing of both wildlife and people as species. However, some politicians are opposed to their opinion and say that we must continue the current exploitation of rainforests. In this essay, it is agreed that people should stop cutting down trees if they want to save nature and themselves.
Let us begin with the reasons why some zoologists argue that people should not make use of logging. The first reason is associated with extinction of species. Many small animals heavily depend on trees so if human beings destroy their habitat, they would disappear as well as many top predators. Another reason is related to air that all species on the Earth need to live. Trees mostly generate a great deal of air, which animals, and people breath to live, but if they were all logged, people would have nothing to breath and eventually die out along with other species. Therefore, after the analysis of the above arguments, it is clear that people should bring an end to man-made deforestation.
Nevertheless, some officials state that extinction due to deforestation is just fiction of pseudo scientists, and people should keep taking advantage of forests. They justify their point of view with the following reasoning. Firstly, loggers generally compensate affected areas. Woodcutting companies tend to plant young trees in places where they operate, so that over time newly grown trees provide local animals with homes, and therefore they will not vanish. Secondly, the loss of trees will not pose threat to air-dependent species because the oceans can replace trees as the main source of air. As a result, after the consideration of the above justifications, it is evident that people should keep logging to ensure overall development.
In conclusion, although some politicians advocate the idea of further deforestation, logging ought to come to an end now for the above mentioned reasons, otherwise, all species on the planet will become extinct after cut-down all trees elsewhere.
- Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 11
- You took your family to a nearby restaurant. You were disappointed with the meal and wish to complain to the manager. Write a letter to the manager of the restaurant.In the letter: explain why you were at the restaurant (what event)describe the problems 84
- The population of most cities is growing as people move to cities to find work and new opportunities. What problems does overpopulation in cities cause?How can these problems be solved? 67
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course.Write a letter to the 73
- It is inevitable that as technology advances traditional cultures will be lost It seems that we cannot have these two things together To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... further deforestation, logging ought to come to an end now for the above mention...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24347826087 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81145375415 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3171945681 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0471598394468 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154085631562 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196408092356 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0309497860739 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00943213794019 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.