Smacking children is the best form of discipline.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Physical punishment has always been around for a long time. Some people believe that corporal punishment is necessary to discipline their children. This essay will argue that smacking children for discipline is completely unacceptable.
The parenting style in some families describes that using power is the best way to control their children's behavior in a more positive way. This is because those parents maintain that the child will remember the pain whenever they do a mistake. In addition, individuals think that their children would be spoiled and never fear punishment. For example, a parent might slap a child on the back of the hand to scare them from doing something unruly. Consequently, people who use corporal punishment have their beliefs that this might help them to educate their children from not repeating the misbehavior.
However, despite those parents, not all people think in the same way about physical punishment is the key to children's discipline, in contrast, other people find smacking children is entirely unjustified. The reasons behind this are first, using power over children doesn't educate them, and eventually, they would probably have mental illnesses. Secondly, corporal punishment will not rising children who respect their parents, exactly the contrary, they will be stubborn, rebel, and potentially criminal. For instance, a recent study suggests that 80% of juvenile crimes are carried out by children who were exposed to physical punishment. Therefore, there are several capable forms of discipline except smacking to raise children at a positive level without spoiling them.
In conclusion, this essay argued why for some people that punishing children physically is the best method for discipline, and they should think again about their violence. In my opinion, smacking children is completely preposterous and can lead to bad consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out bout the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- The maps show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site 73
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and this money culd be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the honey bee Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...is are first, using power over children doesnt educate them, and eventually, they woul...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'rise'
Suggestion: rise
... Secondly, corporal punishment will not rising children who respect their parents, exa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50171821306 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76355755988 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4715299335 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306339246543 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108292484451 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940838035311 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199206268299 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065626295413 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.