Which is the best way for the job interviewers and employers to better know the situation of a job applicant. A. contacting previous employers the job applicant worked for and asking for information B. letting the job applicant work for the company for a short period of time and then decide whether to hire him permanently.
It goes without saying that choosing to hire an applicant is one of the hardest administrators' responsibilities. There has been a controversial debate among managers trying to hire new forces as to which the most effective way to know applicants better is. From my perspective, allowing them to work in company for a while is the best way to get to know them, and my reasons to support my viewpoint are presented as follows.
To begin with, assenting people applying for a job to work for a short period, managers are able to get a lot of correct information about them. It is not a secret to anyone that other resources of useful information such as searching on applicants' page on social media or looking to their previous works and resume are not completely reliable since they might be inaccurate; besides, all applicants do not have any resume and precedent and it is possible that they applied for their first job. On the other hand, working for the company, people searching of a decent career are able to prove themselves which is a significantly reliable source to know applicants since they cannot hide their real abilities or even personality for a long time, so managers are able to make the best decision. As you can see, although getting required information from people's platforms or resume seems rational, it is more likely that they are wrong information about qualifications of an applicant and administrators cannot trust these kinds of evidences.
Furthermore, spending a short period of time working for the company, applicants will show their true abilities and the sense of responsibility to managers. It is crystal clear that first impressions usually do not express one's potentials and talents. Spending more time working, applicants have an opportunity to adapt to the workplace and do their best. Thus it is more likely that they will be hired since manager can monitor the people's performances and evaluated their work. To put it in more vivid picture, having graduated from college; I decided to apply for a really high-prestigious job in a company that is well-known. Unfortunately, I did not have any noticeable background and I thought I could not be able to be hired. But they hired me as an intern, who is not being paid for the first months, when they had realized how diligent and talented I am, I hired and I did make a lot of progress for the company. Had the company not allowed me to work as an intern, it would not experience such a progress.
In sum, not only will managers have a reliable source for getting information, they will also be able to find applicants real abilities and talents which is important for companies' prosperity.
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 78
- It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are young rather than you are old 73
- Some people think that government should not give financial support to creative artists such as painters writers and musicians let them support themselves 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People who do not work because they have enough money are rarely happy 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a or looking to their previous works and resume are not completely reliable since...
^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...idences. Furthermore, spending a short period of time working for the company, applicants wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...irst impressions usually do not express ones potentials and talents. Spending more t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...apt to the workplace and do their best. Thus it is more likely that they will be hir...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1004, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...an intern, it would not experience such a progress. In sum, not only will managers have a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is important for companies prosperity.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, really, so, thus, well, while, as to, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84531590414 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94961429852 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483660130719 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.2335621439 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6875 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366634962486 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121050235772 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08411236114 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236181208887 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541208748398 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.