Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated world, where we live government should invest money on practical projects in order to facilitate the way people live. There has been a controversial debate among politicians and people as to whether investing money on in improving public transportation is more important that dedicating money for accessing the Internet. From my perspective, investing money in reinforcing public transportation system is more beneficial, and two reasons to support my opinion are presented.
To begin with, spending money on reinforcing public transportation system, society can take the advantage of healthier people. It is not a secret to anyone that the biggest problem in today's world is air pollution, which causes enormous damage on people's health and nature. Obviously, by the increasing the number of private vehicles and cars, the concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will increase, meaning it makes climate change and put humans' health in danger, so it is critical to find a way for reducing the damage of global warming. The best way is encouraging people to use bosses and trains instead of their cars and it is not possible unless governments make the most efforts to improve these kinds of services and meet people's need as soon as possible. In this vein, not using personal cars, people will enjoy better health since the amount of pollution definitely decreases. Therefore, governments do not have to spend more money for providing more health services and they can have healthy people enabling to make a lot of progress in communities. No longer will we witness health problems that they causes are air pollution since the amount of greenhouse gases has declined.
Furthermore, doing this, spending money on public transportation, governments can make economic prosperity. It is crystal clear that when the usage of public transportation means increases, our environment will flourish too since less harmful materials will damage trees and flowers. having beautiful and green nature, a country can attract more tourists, who are willing to see untouched landscapes and environments. As a result communities can encourage people living in all over the world to travel to their countries and governments can earn more money and spend it on other practical projects like improving Internet access. not until spending money on improving public transportation will countries experience the flourish of the economy.
In sum, having aforementioned reasons into account; improving public transportation is more vital. Not only will governments have better economic and create affluent societies, they will also be able to take the advantages of healthier people.
- Nowadays people are too obsessed with buying and acquiring material things such as expensive clothes because they think that people around them will judge them based on what they possess 64
- Scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- If you get homesick during your trip which of the following activities do you would be beneficial 1 Make new friends in new community 2 Maintain a contact with people in your hometown 3 Try special food in the new community 76
- Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ial debate among politicians and people as to whether investing money on in improving public ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1127, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ll we witness health problems that they causes are air pollution since the amount of g...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...aterials will damage trees and flowers. having beautiful and green nature, a country c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
...rojects like improving Internet access. not until spending money on improving publi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, as to, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2335.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45560747664 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00987090531 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530373831776 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7188454377 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.352941176 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279659289786 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102089694559 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872877284954 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181780035865 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513594168421 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.