The passage and lecture are both discussing advanteges of smart cars. The passage claim three advanteges of smart cars. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. She states smart cars are not clearly have advanteges.
First, the writer states, these car are safe people live. This is becusae , using them precent many accidents. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this statement. She believes, human alwayes aware of cars in the streets because he has experience in driving. But using of smart cars will increase number of cars in the roads. Futhermore smart cars do not have human ability to be convine to deak with these many cars.
Second, The author argues, using smart cars will reduce trrafic problems. He illustrates on, computer- controlled car can follow each other closely. The professor have opposit opinion. She says, with icreasing in cars number. Cars become more close to each other. Moreover, when accident happan on raod, many car will be involved. Therefore this advantege is not prefely correct.
Finally, the author claim other benefit from using these smart cars. He propposes, these cars will enable their owers to save money. This is due to the fact that, thses car programmed to drive most direct roads. Inaddition, car owners need to spend less money for repair vor replacement parts like brakers, tires and other parts. The professor disagree with this point. She propposes, driving in direct roads is very expentive. Furthermore, these types of cars need a lot of expensive equipement like sensors, As a result, yhis regure more money to spend for these important parts.
The passage and lecture are both discussing advanteges of smart cars. The passage claim three advanteges of smart cars. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article. She states smart cars are not clearly have advanteges.
First, the writer states, these car are safe people live. This is becusae , using them precent many accidents. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this statement. She believes, human alwayes aware of cars in the streets because he has experience in driving. But using of smart cars will increase number of cars in the roads. Futhermore smart cars do not have human ability to be convine to deak with these many cars.
Second, The author argues, using smart cars will reduce trrafic problems. He illustrates on, computer- controlled car can follow each other closely. The professor have opposit opinion. She says, with icreasing in cars number. Cars become more close to each other. Moreover, when accident happan on raod, many car will be involved. Therefore this advantege is not prefely correct.
Finally, the author claim other benefit from using these smart cars. He proposes, these cars will enable their owers to save money. This is due to the fact that, thses car programmed to drive most direct roads. Inaddition, car owners need to spend less money for repair vor replacement parts like brakers, tires and other parts. The professor disagree with this point. She propposes, driving in direct roads is very expentive. Furthermore, these types of cars need a lot of expensive equipement like sensors, As a result, yhis regure more money to spend for these important parts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-05 | talelaldabous | 68 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both about the advantages of team work group The author claims several advantage of group work The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He contradictes each one First the reading passage states working as a group i 60
- Students education is a crucial impact on our society The qeustion is whether it is more beneficialto kids know and understand ideas and concept than facts or opposit this can be weighed in many aspect Admittedly some believes that concepts are more impor 66
- The readind passage and lecture both about possiblity of humenhospitelization on venus The writer claims three reason explains that why venus inhospilable The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He mention when spacecraft fload about 50 Km f 66
- The reading passage and lecturer both talk about economic benefits from offering four day work week for employee instead of five days The writer claim several benefits from this offering The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in article 60
- The passage and lecture are both talking the idea that Sinosauropterys was a feathered dinosaure because theyhad lines in their fossils The writer in the passage claims three reason to critics this idea The lecturer casts doubt on claim mad3e in article S 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e claim three advanteges of smart cars. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in t...
^^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this car' or 'these cars'?
Suggestion: this car; these cars
...advanteges. First, the writer states, these car are safe people live. This is becusae ,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ar are safe people live. This is becusae , using them precent many accidents. The ...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cars'.
Suggestion: many cars
...Moreover, when accident happan on raod, many car will be involved. Therefore this advant...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...pan on raod, many car will be involved. Therefore this advantege is not prefely correct. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, car owners need to spend less money for repair vor replacement parts like br...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, so, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39310044024 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.216513032 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.375 110.228320801 51% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.125 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49667498561 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143407102695 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131737636479 0.0662205650399 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356298340584 0.162205337803 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239914648533 0.0443174109184 541% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.3589403974 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.94 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.