The reading passage and lecture are both about online encyclopedias. The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them less valuble than traditional, printed type. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles. She states, non of these problems which are mentioned, are correct.
First, the writer states, there are many errors information from encyclopedias. This is due to the fact that, contributers often lack academic credentials. This point refutes by lecturer. She says, traditional encyclopedias have never completely correct. online encyclopedias can easy correct if there is any error. As contrast, if there is any error in traditional books, it will still forever, because it can not be fixed.
Second, the author mention, even information in online encyclopedias correct, It is very easy to for users and hackers to delete or fabricate information. The point is challenged by professor. She claims. information of online encyclopedias under strict roles. It is not easily to hacher or change any information'
Lastly, the author contents, online encyclopedias focus on popular topics. It is difficult to say which it importanr and which it not, This argument is rebutted by professor. She says. traditional encyclopedia limited space. but online acadimic sill represented diversity. furthermore online academic have very short advantages.
The readind passage and lecture are both about online encyclopedias. The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them less valuble than traditional, printed type. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles. She states, non of these problems which are mentioned, are correct.
First, the writer states, there are many errors information from encyclopedias. This is due to the fact that, contributers often lack academic credentials. This point refutes by lecturer. She says, tradisional encyclopedias have never completely correct. online encyclopedias can easy correct if there is any error. As contrast, if threr is any error intraditional books, it will still forevere, because it can not be fixed.
Second, the author mention, even information in online encyclopedias correct, It is very easy to for users and hackers to to delet or fabricate information. The point is challenged by professoe. She claims. information of online encyclopedias under strick roles. It is not easly to hacher or change any information'
Lastly, the author contents, online encyclopedias focus on popular topics. It is difficult to say which it importanr and which it not, This argument is rebutted by professor. She says. traditional encyclopedia limited space. but online acadimic sill represented diversity. furthermore online academic have very short advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-19 | talelaldabous | 73 | view |
- The passage and lecture about cheatgrass which is an invasive species of grass these grass cause damage to the animal habitats and drive out other native plants in north American field The writer claims there are three methods to solve the probles get fro 80
- The reading passage and lecture about buzzing which is a type of advertising of priducts Writer of the passage points that buzzing shuold be banned The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says critics about buzzing are missleading First Autho 83
- The reading passage and the lecture discuss several possibilities about of Little Ice Age the writer claims several reasons beyond occurring of Little Ice Age However the lecturer contradicts each point which is mentioned in article She says unfortunately 75
- The reaging passage and lecturer are both discussing invasion of zebra mussel to fresh water The author claims three reasons to believe that this invasion can not be stoped and cause decline in water fish population The le cturer casts doubt on claim made 60
- In our wold there are many celebrities and famous people who have their opnion that may influance others around them The question is whether those celebrities more important for young people than older or not This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The readind passage and lecture are both...
^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...yclopedias. The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...valuble than traditional, printed type. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'errors'' or 'error's'?
Suggestion: errors'; error's
...irst, the writer states, there are many errors information from encyclopedias. This is...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Online
...lopedias have never completely correct. online encyclopedias can easy correct if there...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rect if there is any error. As contrast, if threr is any error intraditional book...
^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...t is very easy to for users and hackers to to delet or fabricate information. The po...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o to delet or fabricate information. The point is challenged by professoe. She c...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...let or fabricate information. The point is challenged by professoe. She claims. ...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Information
...is challenged by professoe. She claims. information of online encyclopedias under strick ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traditional
...ent is rebutted by professor. She says. traditional encyclopedia limited space. but online ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...traditional encyclopedia limited space. but online acadimic sill represented divers...
^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ne acadimic sill represented diversity. furthermore online academic have very short advanta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: furthermore,
...ne acadimic sill represented diversity. furthermore online academic have very short advanta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne academic have very short advantages.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59523809524 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15592161972 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638095238095 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2674120379 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.2777777778 110.228320801 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.6666666667 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 4.19205298013 358% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436194594412 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117428349161 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136278660409 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279398718695 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.250769127905 0.0443174109184 566% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.39 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.02 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.